pic courtesy-Aranmula airport website
These are some of the findings
of an investigation that I and Vishal Menon had carried out last
month in Aranmula, where a private airport is proposed to be constructed. This
report takes a look at the issues of large scale land grab, effects on ecology,
the irregularities in the approvals for the airport and related issues. We
would like to thank Sri Ranganathan, retired rubber board officer and now an
active campaigner against the Aranmula airport, for taking his time out and
helping us out with this work. Most of the Government documents that you see in
this report were obtained by him through months of painstaking effort, using
RTI. The rest were sourced by him from an ex-employee of KGS group, one of the
partners in the airport project. We would also like to thank the villagers and
other officials who took their time out to interact with us. This version is tailor
made for the blog and is slightly different from the original report.
Kerala, once known for producing
surplus food grains, is now facing an alarming decline in area under crop and
as a result, a drop in food production. This fact was revealed in the latest
state economic survey released few weeks back. The area under cultivation
reduced from 2,34,013 ha to
2,13,185 ha in the past one year. It has been an ongoing process over the past
several years, with the area reducing every successive year. The state hardly
produces 11 % of its total requirement of rice. In a densely populated state
like Kerala, there is a shortage of unused land. This has led to reclamation of
paddy fields for public developmental activities and for private real estate
business. One such case of Kerala’s food security being sacrificed for the sake
of development is the proposed private airport at Aranmula in Pathanamthitta
district.
Aranmula is a quaint little village by the river Pamba,
famous for the Parthasarathy temple and the annual boat race associated with
it. Another claim to fame is the Aranmula kannadi, the unique metal
mirrors made by some traditional families residing here. It was declared as a
heritage village by both the central government and the UNDP. The main activity
centre of the village is marked by a handful of small shops. Even being a
tourist centre, there are no big hotels or resorts here. These are situated in
the towns of Chengannur and Pathanamthitta, which are at half-an-hour’s drive
from here. A proposal for a private
airport was announced here in 2008.
The airport proposal
also includes a township consisting of a five star hotel, a three-star hotel
and an International School. Promoters of this airport also promise direct jobs
for 1500 persons and indirect employment to 6000 people. Land value has doubled
in this village after the announcement and it is only going to increase further
if completed. Yet, the residents of Aranmula strongly oppose this plan and fear
that the setting up of this airport would destroy the social fabric of their
village.
The airport is
promoted by a Chennai based real estate firm called KGS developers. It is being
planned at a cost of Rs.2000 crore with the use of 500 acres of land for the
first phase and further 700 acres for its expansion into an International
Airport. Discrepancies surrounding the land that has been earmarked for this
airport and doubts regarding the viability and environmental impact questions
the need for such an airport here. The initial land acquisition for the airport was carried out
over the past decade citing other plans.
Displacement, Destruction
The Aranmula
Airport was envisaged as this village's ticket to development. The initial
optimism shared by residents of this village quickly turned into bitter
opposition after the murky dealings of the "developers" became
apparent. The peace and harmony associated with this village has been disturbed
and now these villagers are fighting to reclaim the village they grew up in.
The project has already damaged the ecosystem of Aranmula with the villagers
suffering from water shortage and destruction of their paddy fields.
"Till a few
years back, we could never have imagined that we would be facing water
shortage, but ever since these wetland were filled for the airport, all the
wells in this area have dried up and now I have to walk some distance everyday
to fetch water," says Nirmala, a mother of two who is sure to lose her
land if the airport becomes a reality. The proposed runway is just a stone’s
throw from her house.
Over 1000
families stand to lose their homes if the project goes on as planned. Moreover,
construction of access roads and the widening of roads to Aranmula will further
increase the number of displacements. The politicians of the village, eyeing an
opportunity, have picked sides in this protest. CPI (M) leader A.
Padmakumar said, "We will oppose any plan in the name of development which
will come up at the expense of our paddy fields and houses. Also, sensitive
sectors such as aviation should not be under the control of private
parties." Even though the project was cleared during his party's regime,
he claims that the party had nothing to do with it as the decision was taken by
the industries secretary.
The ruling
Congress party of Kerala strongly supports this project and local leaders are
campaigning to gather support for the airport. Sadasivan Nair, Aranmula M.L.A
of the Congress party said, "This airport will change the face of Aranmula
and will provide employment for our youth. It will surely become a reality."
He got particularly angry when I started asking uncomfortable questions
regarding land acquisition and the viability of the airport. He refused to
answer more questions over the phone and ended the call.
Non resident
Indians from this area are the ones who will benefit from the airport as it
will reduce their travel time by 2-3 hours. They are a disappointed lot seeing
the strong opposition from the locals. Joy.T, an NRI working in the US said,
"This has always been the case in Kerala. Even when a nuclear plant was
proposed, opposition drove it away saying that it would destroy the environment"
Ever since the
plans for the airport were announced, land prices in the area have multiplied
resulting in Aranmula becoming a hot spot for real estate agents. A simple
search for Aranmula in Google shows sites pointing to real estate projects such
as apartments and villas near the airport. All these activities have raised
suspicions in the minds of the residents of this village. "This is not an
airport project; it is a veil for a large scale land grab" says,
Sriranganathan, a retired government employee and an active campaigner against
the airport.
P.T Nandakumar,
Chief Operating Officer of K.G.S Group, however rubbishing all the allegations
against the proposed airport said, "The people who are opposing this
airport haven't seen one in their lives. Such land acquisitions have taken
place in the case of many other airports too.” There were several
contradictions in the statements made by him, the most notable one being “All
land acquisitions are over”. He later contradicted this by saying “People will
surely sell their land if they get money”, while answering a query on whether
people in the area will be ready to part with their land. He also said that the
preliminary work has started, though on our visit to the area all we could see
were the filled up paddy fields, where no work has been done in the past 2-3
years.
On a query on the
viability and profitability of the project, Mr. Nandakumar gave this
surprisingly undiplomatic reply- “It’s our money. Why should others worry?” The
conversation deteriorated from there with the man questioning my credibility in
asking these questions. He also gave me a list of his degrees implying that I
have not grown enough to question someone of his ‘stature’. More questions and
the man ended the conversation.
This project also
threatens to disturb the sensitive social structure of this village. The annual
Aranmula boat race is an intra village boat race contested by teams from the 52
sections of this village called kara. The construction of this airport will destroy
three such sections or Kara's bringing to an end to this age-old local
tradition. This Hindu majority village also stands to lose three temples which
come under the total land area of this project. Displacement of close to 1000
families (based on satellite images) will also pose a challenge to the
promoters who are facing stiff opposition from the villagers here. Kochukunju,
an old farmer whose house stands on a four cent plot right next to the
reclaimed paddy fileld says, "Whatever happens, I will not move from
here" - proof that the dream of a few may be a nightmare.
Systematic take-over of farmlands
“Till 2002, a part of the area
currently taken over for the proposed airport was under paddy cultivation. The
rest were wetlands. Two streams used to run through this place and the wetland
used to regulate the water availability during summer and also worked as a
flood control mechanism. A bridge that came up here in 2002 created a
bottleneck at the stream and this resulted in widespread crop destruction due
to water logging. In 2004, Abraham Kalamannil, a local businessman, approached
the farmers here and bought some of their lands citing the purpose of fish
cultivation in the wetlands,” says Sri Ranganathan, a retired government
employee and a native of Aranmula. The land was brought under the name of Zion
charitable educational society. He also bought a hill adjoining the wetlands.
By the end of 2004, a part of the
hill was bulldozed and used to fill up the paddy fields, wetlands and rubber
plantations. Due to strong opposition from the natives, work was temporarily
stopped and Abraham filed a writ petition asking for police protection. At this
point, the stated purpose for the use of the land was changed as an ‘airstrip’ for
the aeronautical engineering course in Zion engineering college, run by Abraham
in the adjacent town of Kozhenchery. As per the judgement dated 24th
February 2005, police protection was granted. However, the court also said that
“any building activities or development activities can be done in the
paddy field only after they have got statutory clearance.”
This judgement clearly says that the plan is for a flying school and it objects to the construction activities in the paddy fields
A letter from the tahasildar which says that Abraham Klamannil had cut off a stream which was part of the wetlands by land filling. This move affected the paddy fields and the natural flood control system in the area.
A letter from the Assistant Engineer to Abraham asking him to clear up the stream and restore it to the previous condition.
The remaining
part of the hill which was bull dozed to fill up the paddy fields and the
wetlands. Abraham Kalamannil, a local bussinessman bought this hill and the adjoining
paddy fields and wetlands in 2002. The stated purpose was fish cultivation in
the wetlands. But later, he bulldozed these hills and filled up the wetlands
and announced his plans to set up an airstrip here, which later morphed into an
international airport project.
After a hiatus of about an year, Abraham
restarted filling up the land in 2006. Acting on a complaint from the natives,
the village officer ordered (on 17th July 2006) to stop all
construction or land filling activity in the area until further notice. But the
land filling activities continued. During this time, one of the streams that were
part of the wetlands was cut off by land filling. This badly affected the few
paddy fields that were left in this area. The stream and a part of the wetlands
were part of the Govt’s puramboke land and a private party does not have
any rights to carry out any activity on such land. More prohibitory orders from
the Tahasildar and the district collector were not honoured.
A letter from the Revenue divisional officer asking the local police to take the vehicles used for illegal land filling at night times into custody. It also talks about the illegal transfer of paddy fields to a trust.
A part of the
kozhithode stream that was cut off from the Pamba river by the wetland
reclamation activities for the construction of the Aranmula airport
The local court had registered
two cases against Abraham on 15th March 2008 for illegally
reclaiming government land. But the accused never appeared on court. The true
intention for the buying up of so much land was revealed only in late 2008 with
the formation of the company Aranmula Airport Limited, a consortium of Non-
Residential Keralite’s organization and Mount Zion trust owned by Abraham. This
was when the plans for an international airport in this little village were
announced. In 2009, the land that was acquired by Abraham was transferred to
KGS group, a Chennai based real estate group. A look at the group’s website
will tell you that the group has never done any construction activity other
than flats.
“No paddy cultivation has
happened here in the past 25 years. With so many farmer suicides happening,
everyone is trying to get out of agriculture. When the state government gives
rice at such low rates who will want to continue with farming,” says P.T.
Nandakumar, Chief Operating Officer of KGS group. But he evaded the question on
the shrinking agricultural area in the state and the illegal ways in which
paddy fields were acquired for the project.
An important document that disproves the claims of KGS group that paddy cultivation stopped in this area 25 years back is this certificate from the agriculture officer of the local krishi bhavan. It says that “Paddy cultivation has become impossible due to the filling and conversion of paddy fields and also the filling of valiyathodu (big stream). During 2004-05, 45 ha of paddy had been cultivated in this area and it has been reduced to 20 ha in this year (2009). Due to the filling of the stream, the cultivated paddy crop faces the threat of flooding during the summer rain.” In 2010, there were news reports in the local media that there was crop destruction in this area owing to flooding.
The final nail on the coffin was this Government order on 24th February 2011, converting the 500 acres of land proposed for the airport into an industrial area by the Kerala Industrial Single Window Clearance Boards and Industrial Township Area Development Act 1999. This meant that the Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act of 2008 was not applicable for this area, thus paving the way for reclamation of the land for any purpose. This Government order was released as a secret gazette on 1st March 2011, the day on which the assembly elections were announced in the state. The peculiarity of a secret gazette is that it is not as easily accessible to the public as the normal gazettes. The gazette was signed by T. Balakrishnan, the then additional chief secretary of the Industries and Commerce department.
What we
see here is a systematic destruction of paddy cultivation in the area by
private parties with the help of some elements from the Government over the
course of several years for the sake of an airport, the viability and the need
for which has already raised questions.
The
latest news in this regard is that “the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) had reportedly taken a
serious view of the conversion of paddy fields and wetlands for setting up the
project and sought clarifications
from the State government.”
The
google map showing the project area of the airport. (See the next survey map for
details)
The Taluk map
marked with the survey numbers which come under the first phase of the airport
project. There are close to 1000 houses coming in this marked area, which was
revealed when this was matched with corresponding images from google maps. The
standalone red markings mean that the unmarked areas between these will be
acquired for the airport. This will increase the number of houses that will be
evicted for the project. KGS, the company which is developing the airport
claims that only six families need to be evacuated for the project and that all
of them have agreed to the same. More houses will be evacuated for the proposed
40m approach road to the airport, which is currently a narrow road with houses
densely located on eaither side. Three temples are also present in the marked
area. This map was prepared by Sri Ranganathan, a retired Government employee and
an active campaigner against the airport project.
Flaws galore in airport
clearance
The procedures
through which the various clearances for the Aranmula airport were obtained
have raised questions on their legality. The first proposal for the setting up
of a Greenfield airport in Aranmula was given by the KGS group to the Kerala
Industrial Infrastructure Development Board (KINFRA) in 2009, requesting KINFRA
to take sweat equity of 3 % in the project. A new airport which is built from
scratch in a new location because an existing airport is unable to meet the
projected requirements of traffic is called a Greenfield airport. According to
the Government's Greenfield airport policy, no such airport would be allowed
within an aerial distance of 150 km from an existing airport. However, the proposed
Aranmula airport is located at less than 100 km air distance from both
Trivandrum and Cochin International airports.
In this initial
proposal, KGS group had stated that 'work of the airport is already in progress
and 300 acres, out of the 500 acres identified, has already been registered.'
This claim is repeated in a letter to the State Government (on 12th April
2010), requesting NOC for the project. A natural question that arises is on how
the work on the airport started before getting any clearances. It is another
matter that even now, all one can see in the site location is a piece of filled
land reclaimed from wetlands.
The State
Government gave 'in principle' approval to KGS group for the project on 8th
September 2010. However in two separate letters to the Chief Minister, one from
KGS group and another from the then Aranmula MLA K.C. Rajagopalan,
it is mentioned that 'we have approached the district collector, Pathanamthitta
for getting the land transacted to the present company. But we are told that
since the owner of the land, Abraham Kalamannil, has developed the land in
violation of certain rules, it cannot be transacted unless a direction is
issued by the Government.'
This makes it
amply clear that while applying for project approval and even after the project
was approved, the company did not even have the land registered in their name.
Abraham, although a stakeholder in the project, is not part of the KGS group,
which applied for the project. KGS has 65 % (15% with reliance) and Abraham has
30 % stake in the project. While applying for approval, the company even
claimed ownership of land owned by others and government puramboke land.
After this, came
the Government order on 24th February 2011, converting the 500 acres of land
proposed for the airport into an industrial area by the Kerala Industrial
Single Window Clearance Boards and Industrial Township Area Development Act
1999. As per section-18 of the Industrial Single Window Act, those places
notified as industrial area would not only remain outside the purview of the
master plan or zonal plan but also remain excluded from any legislation passed
by the State Assembly. It is worth recollecting that the controversial Coca
Cola factory in Plachimada was given clearance by utilizing the same Act. This
Act has never been used in the case of an Airport, which is not an industry per
se.
This meant that
the Conservation of Paddy and Wetland Act of 2008 was not applicable for this
area, thus paving the way for reclamation of the land for any purpose. One of
the clauses of the wetland act states that, "The Government may grant
exemption from the provisions of this Act, if such conversion or reclamation is
essential for any public purpose. Such conversion or reclamation shall not
adversely affect the cultivation of paddy in the adjoining paddy land and also
the ecological conditions in that area." However, most of the paddy
cultivation in the area stopped after reclamation of streams and wetlands for
the project. And, the 'public purpose' of a privately owned airport in an agricultural
village is debatable. It is also to be noted that the wetlands and paddy fields
were filled up much before it was converted into an industrial area, which
clearly was against the law. According to the 73rd amendment of the constitution,
only Grama sabhas have the rights to plan development in their respective
areas. This was not followed in the case of the Aranmula airport where it was
over ridden was the help of other industry friendly Acts.
The
Pathanamthitta District Collector is yet to take a decision on KGS's letter
dated 1st November 2011, requesting for mutation of 300 acres of land spread
over four villages. Effectively, the KGS group is still not in possession of
the land that is planning to build the airport in. The Defence Ministry refused
to grant clearance for the airport in a letter dated 20th January 2011. It said
that, "since the establishment of Greenfield Airport at Aranmula would
result in imposing severe restrictions on the availability of airspace for
conduct of military flying at Naval Air Station INS Garuda at Kochi, it was not
possible to agree for NOC." However, the company claimed to have got a 'No
Objection Certificate' from the ministry in August 2011. It is still not clear
what exact change in conditions prompted the Ministry to change their stance
suddenly. Consequent to the Defence approval, in October 2011, the Ministry of
Civil aviation granted the site clearance approval.
Many people we
spoke to, cited the name of TKA Nair, adviser to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh,
as the person responsible for the airport getting most of these clearances so
easily through dubious ways. But then, we could not gather any proof to
substantiate such claims. Meanwhile, yesterday’s Hindu carried a report on how
TKA Nair used his clout in the allotment of land to two of his relatives in the
co-operative society of BEML employees. This was allegedly done in violation of
society rules which states that the plots should be allotted only for BEML
employees, which Nair’s relatives were not.
A tale of two Environmental
Impact Assessments
The environmental impact of the
proposed airport in Aranmula has now become an issue of debate with two
separate agencies releasing conflicting reports on the same. The first report,
the official Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) commissioned by the KGS group,
was conducted by Envirocare, a private agency based in Chennai. The Ministry of
Environment and Forest gave environmental clearance for the project based on
this report. But there are many glaring omissions in this assessment, the most
notable one being the conversion of 500 acres of paddy fields and wet land for
the airport. Another one is the blocking of the kozhithode stream by land
filling activities for the airport, which resulted in the destruction of acres
of paddy in floods.
According to the Envirocare study,
there are no rare and endangered species recorded in the study area. “The present site is devoid of trees
and shrubs. The only vegetation covered on the land is grass, which will be
disturbed and some part will be lost in construction activity. As no forestland is involved in the core
zone, the flora and fauna of the area will not be affected. Also, the core and buffer zone does not
contain any endangered plant, animals and species, which might be affected due
to the plant operations. The existing status of flora and fauna will continue
to prevail almost undisturbed even after the commencement of the project
operations,” the report goes on to add.
Another contestable claims goes-“Construction of the airport does not
involve any heavy construction equipment.”
In sharp contrast to this is the environmental
impact report released last week by the Salim Ali Foundation based on a study
conducted by Dr. V.S.Vijayan and team. According to this report, out of the 212
plant species recorded from the area, 27 are endemic to the Western Ghats and
110 are economically important, mainly for its medicinal properties. Out of the
60 fish species, 42 % are endemic to the Western ghats.
In a particularly damaging allegation,
Dr. Vijayan said that most of the local plant species mentioned in the
Envirocare report is not even present in the area. Except one, all others
mentioned in that report are dry land species, whereas the project area is a
wetland. The official EIA which is eloquent on technical details of the airport
is bereft of facts and figures when it comes to assessing the biological
impact.
“The contiguous paddy fields and
wetlands are the flood plains of the river pamba and serve as natural flood
control in the area, reducing the impact of flood on the local population and
their lives considerably,” the report by Dr. Vijayan says. The wet lands are
also said to act as breeding grounds for the fishes. Another important
contribution is in maintaining the water level in the wells and ponds in the
surrounding villages.
Mr. Vijayan pegs the total loss of
intangible benefits due to the filling up of the wetlands as anywhere between
Rs. 314 to 419 crores. Added to this is the loss of tangible benefits in the
form of fish and paddy production. The report also says that at least
1000 houses will come under the project area, resulting in the eviction of
around 3000 people. The official EIA is silent on this aspect even though many
pages are dedicated to describe the social and economic status of the people in
this village. The Envirocare report also talks about a 23 m wide approach road
from Aikkara junction to the airport, but does not say anything about the
number of houses to be evicted. This is currently a narrow road with houses
densely located on either side.
Instead of this, the EIA makes vague
statements on the company’s CSR initiatives- “The
corporate social responsibility commitments of KGS Airport Authority will lead
to the development of socially and economically marginalized communities and
the underserved sections of the society. These activities will lead to
community development for those who are living near to the Airport.”
A controversial claim in the official report is that there are no
archeological and cultural monuments within 10 km radius of the site. The
famous Aranmula temple is only 200 m from the boundary of the proposed airport.
Also, some small temples come inside the project area, so does some small
traditional workshops which make the Aranmula mirror. On top of all that,
Aranmula itself was declared as a heritage village by both the Central
government and the UNDP.
Another question is about the source of sand for filling up the
wetland. A preliminary assessment by the Salim Ali Foundation says that a
minimum of 96 lakhs tones of sand is required for the project. Also, the total
requirement of raw water for this airport will be 7.55 KLD, which according to
Envirocare will be met from own Bore wells and municipal water supply. This is
bound to deplete the groundwater resources further, adding to the effects of wetland
reclamation.
The latest report in this regard is that the MoEF was yet to give clearance for
the airport project, despite the National Expert Environment Impact Assessment
Authority recommending the same on the basis of an Environment Impact Assessment
(EIA) report prepared by a Chennai-based consultant.
Why an airport?
The promoters of
the project in their website have said that air travelers from the districts of
Alappuzha, Idukki, Pathanamthitta and Kottayam would benefit due to the strong
"non-resident Indian base here" which accounts for more than 40 per
cent of Kerala's air traffic population. Aranmula is centrally located between
the International airports at Kochi and Thiruvanathapuram with an air traffic
distance of under 100 kilometres. The proximity to the Sabarimala temple
(located 94 kilometres away) and to the venue of the annual Christian
convention called the Maramon Convention has also been cited as the need for
this airport.
Mohan Mathew, a
non-resident Keralite working in Dubai says, "It takes us about three and
a half hours to reach either of the two airports. It takes longer for us to
reach our homes from the airport than for us to reach India from Dubai"
However, this
does not justify the need for an airport here. Among the four districts claimed
by the promoters as standing to benefit, air travelers from the districts of
Kottayam and Alappuzha would still use the airport at Kochi which is closer
than the proposed airport. Also, among the pilgrims who come to the state to go
to Sabarimala, not even one per cent travels by air. Similarly only a small
part of the one lakh pilgrims who attend the Maramon convention need an
airport.
Also, if the need
for an airport was to reduce travel time from and to the airports at Trivandrum
and Kochi, a plan to build better roads to these places would have proved to be
more convenient and cost-effective considering the falling profitability of the
present airports.
PS- All the available documents have not been included in this
post, considering its length. If anyone wants to go through the whole set of
documents and the two complete environment impact reports, drop me a mail -
praveen.clicks@gmail.com.
It would be great if you could spread the word
regarding this illegal land grab in the name of an airport. We were surprised
at the lack of knowledge about this issue outside the village. Most of the
mainstream media has ignored it. One of the local journalists with one of the
two leading malayalam dailies, who had given us some vital information, said
that we would never find these in his own newspaper as they never spoke
anything against big business. While our media spend hours discussing such inane issues as 5th minister in the cabinet and all other petty party group fights, our rice bowls are being slowly gobbled up by the corporates.
9 comments:
Well done guys.. But u missed a lot of documents that can prove the illegal nexus between the company and the Political leadership of the state. KGS cheated the Govt in many ways and it is evident from the file.
Anyways, Hats off to your work. Go ahead...
Environmental impact is basically BS. All these paddy were once artificially created altering the natural state of land. If we had people like Sugathakumari at that time I am sure she would have claimed that we should not do organized cultivation. BTW is anyone cultivating these fields anymore ? We have 100,000 acres of uncultivated paddy fields in Kottayam district.
Very good job indeed, we need to save the villagers from loosing their land. In a small state like kerala, what is the need for 5 international airports (Including the one coming at kannur and aranmula)
പ്രീയപ്പെട്ടവരേ, വിമാനത്താവളം പോലുള്ള ബ്രഹത് പദ്ധതികള്ക്ക് വേണ്ട അനുമതികള് ഒരിക്കലും വളരെ എളുപ്പത്തില് ലഭിക്കില്ല. അതിനുള്ള കാരണം വിശദമായ പഠനങ്ങള് ഈ വിഷയത്തില് ആവശ്യമാണ് എന്നുള്ളത് തന്നെയാണ്. എന്റെ അറിവനുസരിച്ച് ഏകദേശം ഇരുപതില് അധികം സര്ക്കാുര് ഏജെന്സികളെ എല്ലാ വിശദാംശങ്ങളും ബോധ്യപ്പെടുത്തി ചെറുതും വലുതുമായ അനുമതികള് വാങ്ങി വേണം പദ്ധതിയുമായി മുന്നോട്ടു പോകാന്. ആരാധനാലയങ്ങള്, ആള്ക്കാ്രുടെ കുടിയൊഴിപ്പിക്കല്, പാരിസ്ഥിതിക സംതുലനം എന്നിവയൊക്കെ ഇതുമായിബന്ധപ്പെട്ടുള്ള സുപ്രധാനങ്ങളായ വിഷയങ്ങളാണ്. അതുകൊണ്ട് തന്നെ ഇവയൊക്കെ പഠിക്കാതെയാണ് കേന്ദ്ര-സംസ്ഥാന സര്ക്കാൊരുകള് ഈ വികസന പദ്ധതിക്ക് വേണ്ട അംഗീകാരങ്ങള് കൊടുത്തത് എന്ന് വിശ്വസിക്കാന് വളരെ പ്രയാസമാണ്.
good work ... but fabricated
Our MLA & MP is not interested for a realiable Rail connectivity or improvement of rail infrastructure in the area(Chenganur) or Long Distance Bus Service from/ Via Aranmula.
Hi,
Great work. Appretiate your effort.
Two days back I got an oppertunity to meet Sri Ranganathan. Since then I was googling on Aranmula project and came across your blog.
Regards
Achyuth
Thank you for conducting and writing up this most interesting and informative investigation of Aranmula airport. I am involved in campaigns against unsustainable aviation expansion in the UK, and trying to help raise awareness of what is happening in Aranmula, and at other sites in India. I am shocked by the aggressive land acquisition and level of government policy support and subsidy for new airports,often very close to established airports.
Great Job Guys...And Finally a good judgement from Green Tribunal...But the fight still would be needed.
EIA done for this project was seen as insufficient by the Tribunal as well as the Tribunal suspected the credibility of the same due to inexperience of the agency. We have cases where lakhs of crores gets lost in corruption, tweaking an EIA is not that difficult.
The lands terrain in these area always had wetlands and low lying lands. So the conversion to paddy fields (if happened, I'm not sure...) wouldn't have impacted the natural environment there. But the land filling in large scale can't be considered as a reverse mechanism, as this would affect the Ground water replenishment as well as result in floods in the areas. This would result in, remaining cultivable land becoming unfit for the same. (An opportunity for the grabbers, the farmers would be forced to sell even if it's against his will).............The solution to assure Food Security in Kerala
(as well as India) is through improving farming techniques and assistance and providing incentives for farmers so as to resume farming. Also better Food Processing units and options should flourish.
Post a Comment